This blog explores two prominent token standards: ERC-20 and BRC-20, simplifying their complexities and showing you how to leverage them for your business ventures, including BRC-20 token development.
Tokenization is the process of converting the rights of an asset into a digital token on a blockchain. It involves issuing a blockchain token representing a unit of value or an asset. Tokens digitally represent a real tradable asset.
These assets can be physical, like real estate or artwork, or digital, like a share in a company or a utility within a specific ecosystem. They offer:
Read More on Tokenization | Asset Tokenization Development | A Comprehensive Guide
ERC-20 is an Ethereum standard for fungible tokens. Developers use this standard to build smart contract-enabled tokens that represent assets, ownerships, rights, cryptos, and beyond. ERC-20 enables developers to create tokens that are the same as other tokens.
Here are the characteristics of ERC-20 tokens:
ERC-20 tokens offer multiple use cases that make them a popular choice for a wide range of applications within the blockchain ecosystem:
Check It Out | ERC-20 Token Standard | A Compact Guide to Development
The BRC-20 token standard, designed for the Bitcoin blockchain, is an experimental fungible token standard facilitating the development and transfer of tokens through the ordinals protocol. Unlike ERC-20, BRC-20 doesn't rely on smart contracts. Instead, it utilizes ordinal inscriptions.
Bitcoin ordinal inscriptions, introduced on Jan 21, 2023, by Casey Rodarmor, enable users to inscribe data, like JSON code, onto satoshi tokens. They provide a unique approach distinct from ERC-20's smart contract reliance.
Here are the characteristics of BRC-20 tokens:
BRC-20 tokens offer the following use cases:
Suggested Read | BRC-20 Token | Everything You Need To Know
Here are the key differences between ERC-20 and BRC-20 tokens:
BRC-20 and ERC-20 represent distinct token standards on separate blockchains. BRC-20 operates on the Bitcoin blockchain, while ERC-20 is native to the Ethereum blockchain.
ERC-20 and BRC-20 tokens differ significantly when it comes to their development. Developers create ERC-20 tokens using smart contracts on Ethereum.
On the other hand, BRC-20 takes a non-standard approach, utilizing Bitcoin's existing UTXO model. Instead of building a smart contract, token information is embedded directly into satoshis, the smallest units of Bitcoin.
ERC-20 tokens operate seamlessly within Ethereum. Every transaction involving these tokens follows the established ERC-20 protocol. This ensures compatibility with Ethereum wallets, exchanges, and dApps.
BRC-20 tokens take a more independent approach with parallel operation. BRC-20 transactions are validated separately from Bitcoin transactions, using a dedicated set of rules encoded within the inscribed JSON files. This creates a distinct layer of operation on top of the Bitcoin network.
The integration capability of BRC-20 tokens holds a distinct advantage over ERC-20 tokens, particularly in streamlining remittance processes. BRC-20 tokens can utilize the Lightning Network (LN) and provide an efficient remittance solution without compromising network security.
In contrast, while ERC-20 standards are designed for composability with other blockchains, this flexibility comes at a security cost. BRC-20 tokens, prioritizing security, avoid such compromises. This makes them a more secure option compared to ERC-20 tokens.
ERC-20 stands out for its inherent flexibility, granting businesses the ability to tailor tokens to specific use cases on Ethereum. This adaptability ensures precision in functionality and opens doors to a myriad of possibilities.
On the other hand, BRC-20 tokens, rooted in the Bitcoin blockchain, initially present challenges in supporting a wide range of use cases. The ecosystem may find its strength in a focused approach, catering to specific sectors.
Transaction speed is predominantly determined by the processing efficiency of transactions. On the Ethereum blockchain, transaction speed is influenced by the Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) concept. In Ethereum, users can offer higher gas fees to receive preferential treatment.
In contrast, Bitcoin employs a different approach, writing data on blocks and relying on miners to validate them. Unlike the Ethereum blockchain, Bitcoin's transaction processing is not influenced by the ability to pay higher fees.
Explore More | BRC-20 Wallet Development | What You Need To Know
While ERC-20 tokens offer flexibility and integration within the Ethereum ecosystem, BRC-20 tokens bring security and potential speed advantages to the Bitcoin blockchain.
You need to carefully consider your priorities, such as integration, security, flexibility, transaction speed, and community adoption, to guide your decision. Understanding these nuances helps you select the token standard that aligns with your vision. It can unlock the full potential of your digital assets and pave the way for success in the ever-evolving blockchain world.
Interested in token development? Contact us to hire crypto developers today!